I'm not sure quite what to make of The Lost Estate. It was Alain-Fournier's first novel, and parts of it read as if they are the writer's collected oddments: vignettes, descriptive passages, overheard lines, which suggest he was using his magpie hoard of bright and shiny things to decorate his story, but in a self-conscious and not very coherent way. On the other hand, there are episodes which speak of greater skill and maturity, where its stiltedness gives way - despite the limitations of translation - to much more fluency and clear-sightedness.
It seems to have a sum greater than its parts in that it demands of the reader much more than the writer in his turn is giving - the lost estate itself, something which immediately conjures fabulous images in our mind - is in fact ramshackle, shabby, ill-defined. We are expected to believe that, fairy-tale like, there is enduring love at first sight between Meaulnes and Yvonne de Galais, and yet he is all too ready to leave her later, so the lengthy love-lorn seeking was misplaced, and she, like her home, is eventually no more. Despite the sadness, the desolation, I was left feeling that what was lost wasn't described as quite wonderful enough to warrant being found, and that gives me pause.
What was much more interesting and poignant, though almost completely undeveloped, were Francois' feelings for Yvonne, described in the line "... I loved her with that deep, secret love that is never spoken". Now there's a thing.
Some sections of the book have a languid, filmic quality to them, but that controlled detachment then recedes, and while the main characters shift back and forth in thought and behaviour between boyhood and manhood, so scenes go from an appreciation of beauty, say, to impatience, anxiety, a sense of loss - adolescent mood swings, almost - and there is no discernible unifying, harmonising 'key'.
The implausibility of much of it perplexed me, too, but that and its melodrama may be a product of its time and place, and yet, despite all this, it is lingering in my mind and a second reading might well fix it there. Its effect is as of a conjuring trick - you can't see how it's done, yet something has been done. I'm still not sure, though prepared to be persuaded. How about you?
(For this book's "Books and Cakes" post, look here).