I said on Friday that I was keen to test The Eisenhower Matrix, or How To Work More Efficiently, as outlined in The Decision Book. This takes its name from President Eisenhower who was a master of time management and who apparently said that the most urgent decisions are rarely the most important ones.
All you do is draw a box, divide it into four and label the areas as follows:
top right - Urgent & Important - put here things you must do immediately
top left - Important but Not Urgent - assign dates to whatever you put here and try to ensure these tasks are dealt with before they become urgent
bottom left - Not Important, Not Urgent - do the things in this box later
bottom right - Urgent, but Not Important - delegate these things (I have nothing in that box - telling?)
The book gives slightly more information, but that's the basis of it, and I've now organised my work 'to do' list as described, simple prioritising helping me to feel I have everything in hand. The book then goes on to refine the model with a method attributed to financier Warren Buffett: "make a list of everything you want to get done today. Begin with the task at the top and continue only when you have completed it." That may sound obvious, but if you tend to flit from one thing to another, it's probably a good discipline to adopt.
By the way, near the top of my list was 'choose next CBG book'. I'm glad to say I have ticked that one off and I hope to post the title here tomorrow.
hmm
I've been through all this stuff via various courses over the years.
I guess you will just have to experience the value of it for yourself before coming to a decision about how to make a decision!
Posted by: Sandy | 20 March 2011 at 09:29 PM
Seem's like Stephen Covey used the same matrix in his 7 Habits of Highly Effective People several years ago. I didn't remember it being attributed to Eisenhower, though. To me, that makes it a little more interesting. My question with the fourth box is how it can be urgent if it's not important? (I wouldn't have anything in that box either.)
Posted by: Susan in TX | 20 March 2011 at 10:01 PM
Don't get addicted to making lists!
Posted by: Dark Puss | 20 March 2011 at 10:34 PM
I think list making is a genetically fixed trait. Some folk wake up in the morning and lists of things to do just arrive in their head. Others just bumble through the day going from one thing to the next as it occurs to them.
Yes you've guessed I am in the 2nd group. I wouldn't mind a list but there isn't a place for one!
Posted by: Sandy | 21 March 2011 at 08:33 AM
I think what I was getting at is that actually making (and ticking off) lists can almost become a goal in its own right! I used to make quite detailed lists (after I read books like the Cornflower is discussing) but soon found that I liked making the lists much more than getting on with the work; it had become a displacement activity. Now I do know some people (rather few actually) who seems to be able to make rapidly an extensive list and then just move forward. I tend to keep my lists in my head these days, although I do keep a detailed on-line diary which clearly substitutes at some level.
Posted by: Dark Puss | 21 March 2011 at 09:56 AM
I wondered about the 'urgent but not important' things, too, and Mr. C. suggested it may be something like an imminent but unimportant deadline, e.g. the post box is due to be emptied in five minutes' time so you rush to post your letter, but you could just as well wait until the next collection later in the day.
Posted by: Cornflower | 21 March 2011 at 07:37 PM
You also - and this is a serious point - need to discard somethings as not worth doing at all. And remember, that deciding which things to do first is not a decision which results in any of your tasks being completed - that job still awaits. So you need to avoid the preparation of tasks becoming a dynamic process (as non-urgent become urgent etc)which actually stops you doing things at all. You also, I think, need to be free of the tyranny of priority - sometimes you just feel happier getting some little unimportant task done, and that makes the rest of the pile easier. Or you might feel that if only you could crack this difficult task, you would feel relieved and empowered, so you should do it, whatever order it comes in.
I confess to being a bit sceptical about your book's style of approach, because I worry that these systems are only displacing the problem from the primary decision to the entirely trivial one of which box to put the task in, or which direction to assign to it (whatever that means). Anyway, Malcolm Gladwell's Blink will convince you that most decisions are taken in the first two seconds (and they're good decisions, too!)- you just haven't found out what you think (!), or you're post-hoc-ing it into another framework (ie, rational explanations to convince the family, the board, parliament etc), or - crucially - you've realised that this decision is one where the two second snap isn't right. Someone as intelligent and self aware as you shouldn't play with these boxes, you should read Blink and my next paragraph!
A really good question to ask yourself is what will be the consequence of not doing something. That's often, I find, a much better guide than the converse. And, speaking as someone who has made a fair few decisions over the years, its amazing how much less dreadful not doing something is than you normally expect. That's a reason for actively deciding not to do something - or postponing it for the sake of an even more critical action - not a reason for not deciding.
If this makes any sense, I'd be surprised, because I couldn't decide whether to comment or not, because everyone makes their own decisons their own way and it could be presumptuous to interfere. Is there any comfort to be gained from the thought that in a parallel universe, Cornflower is making exctly the reverse decision? No, I thought not!
Posted by: Lindsay | 21 March 2011 at 10:14 PM
Urgent but not important is one of the classic categories, and applies to many many decisions or tasks - eg, an editor meeting a deadline for a newspaper - or a politician needing his speech typed for the BBC interview - but the actual event is completely trivial. I bet you have dozens of things in this box all the time, you just think they're important when they're not!Urgency can be imposed by deadlines, or rank, or both.
Posted by: Lindsay | 21 March 2011 at 10:18 PM
Wise words Lindsay; very good advice indeed.
Peter
Posted by: Dark Puss | 22 March 2011 at 08:59 AM
Erm, ok, boss....
Seriously - thankyou, Lindsay.
Posted by: Cornflower | 22 March 2011 at 09:55 PM